Critical?

What makes good and capable leaders different from 'wanna-be-as-good' leaders?

My opinion, ability to accept positive or negative critics and feedbacks. Lead with open mind and always believe that critics and feedbacks will help the person in the leading position aware of the shortcomings that may not be expressed by people who are working around. As some may know, there are some creatures with a nice English noun that reads 'hypocrite(s)' lingering around an organisation. These people are the worst creatures that ever exist in the working culture in the organisation. Having them are, believe me, the worst experience ever felt by leaders, especially when expectations towards them are high where opinions are crucial - more often than not, they are blinded by the "Yes, sir - No problem, sir - Everything's right, sir" assurance. Bless the hypocrites. How could things be right when they are so wrong!

No point in becoming leaders of leaders when you can't open to critics. Everyone's thinking of the best for the organisation. I would like to be full of praises for an organisation who've done so much for me and other young people around but again, I couldn't stand from keeping my mouth shut if things are not going well. At least not as far as I could see. Prove me wrong and assure the concerned people around that things are really going on an upward trend.

However, I really appreciate a fast reply from the MCs in showing interest to provide further explanations on the role and direction in ensuring growth in the national chapters. Thumbs up for the members in the team but for other leaders in the team who could not take the critics as opinions expressed out of concern, too bad to say, you're not ready to lead yet. Being upset and disappointed of feedbacks are just a sign of an immature leader.

God bless.